minor editorial nits


I don't really have any comments on 4.1.2 and 4.1.3. They seem fine, apart  
 from these nits:

1. The reference to XMLHttpRequest is out of date (the draft also had a  
small name change).
2. XMLHttpRequest is not consistently marked up in the draft. I suggest  
you simply use it as a name and not use <code> (unless you actually  
reference the object and not the concept).
3. The time it is present in code XML is not completely in uppercase. That  
is wrong.


Anne van Kesteren

Received on Friday, 12 February 2010 10:58:39 UTC