Re: Re: Content Transformatnion Guidelines: Last Call Working Draft ( LC-2085) ( LC-2268 LC-2267)

 Dear Thomas Roessler ,

The Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Guidelines for Web
Content Transformation Proxies 1.0 published on 6 Oct 2009. Thank you for
having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ct-guidelines-20100211/.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-bpwg-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 11 March
2010. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group,
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
François Daoust
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/98E37A5A-6A89-4185-A59A-5AB8393FB7C8@w3.org
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ct-guidelines-20091006/


=====

Your comment on 4.2.9 Proxy Decision to Transform:
> As a final comment, in the check list at the top of section 4.9.2, the 
> 
> "other factors" laudably include:
> 
> > "the user agent has features (such as linearization or zoom) that  
> > allow it to present the content unaltered;"
> 
> Given that content transformation proxies at times depend on the  
> network that is used to access a resource, it might also be worthwhile 
> 
> calling out the use of a "desktop" browser over a mobile network as a 
> 
> case that proxies should take into account.


Working Group Resolution (LC-2268):
We agree and have updated the bullet point in section 4.2.9 to mention
that use case.

----

Your comment on 4.2.9.2 Link Rewriting:
> From a quick review, section 4.2.9.3 looks vastly improved.  I'll  
> solicit the WSC WG's opinions on the changed version; speaking  
> personally, I'm happy with the current text.
> 
> I would like to call out a specific point in 4.2.9.2:
> 
> > Proxies must preserve security between requests for domains that are 
> 
> > not same-origin in respect of cookies and scripts.
> 
> It is probably worthwhile to call out in non-normative security  
> considerations what that actually means -- namely, fairly heavy  
> rewriting of scripts along the lines of what CaJa does, and rewriting 
> 
> of cookies to emulate the behavior that a browser would otherwise show.


Working Group Resolution (LC-2267):
We take your point, but this document does not specify the internal
operation of transforming proxies so we find it hard to think of anything
useful to say.

----

Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 22:32:08 UTC