Re: minor editorial nits ( LC-2377)

 Dear Anne van Kesteren ,

The Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Guidelines for Web
Content Transformation Proxies 1.0 published on 11 Feb 2010. Thank you for
having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/100402.html.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-bpwg-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 13 April
2010. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group,
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
François Daoust
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/op.u70gq30u64w2qv@annevk-t60
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ct-guidelines-20100211/


=====

Your comment on 4.1.2 no-transform directive in Request:
> 
> Hey,
> 
> I don't really have any comments on 4.1.2 and 4.1.3. They seem fine,
> apart  
>  from these nits:
> 
> 1. The reference to XMLHttpRequest is out of date (the draft also had a
>  
> small name change).
> 2. XMLHttpRequest is not consistently marked up in the draft. I suggest
>  
> you simply use it as a name and not use <code> (unless you actually  
> reference the object and not the concept).
> 3. The time it is present in code XML is not completely in uppercase.
> That  
> is wrong.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 


Working Group Resolution (LC-2377):
Thanks, fixed in the latest revision of the spec.

----

Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 14:39:14 UTC