- From: <fd@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:39:12 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Dear Anne van Kesteren , The Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies 1.0 published on 11 Feb 2010. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments! The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has been implemented in the new version of the document available at: http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/100402.html. Please review it carefully and let us know by email at public-bpwg-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 13 April 2010. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track. Thanks, For the Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux François Daoust W3C Staff Contacts 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/op.u70gq30u64w2qv@annevk-t60 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ct-guidelines-20100211/ ===== Your comment on 4.1.2 no-transform directive in Request: > > Hey, > > I don't really have any comments on 4.1.2 and 4.1.3. They seem fine, > apart > from these nits: > > 1. The reference to XMLHttpRequest is out of date (the draft also had a > > small name change). > 2. XMLHttpRequest is not consistently marked up in the draft. I suggest > > you simply use it as a name and not use <code> (unless you actually > reference the object and not the concept). > 3. The time it is present in code XML is not completely in uppercase. > That > is wrong. > > Cheers, > > Working Group Resolution (LC-2377): Thanks, fixed in the latest revision of the spec. ----
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 14:39:14 UTC