- From: Eduardo Casais <casays@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 06:49:50 -0800 (PST)
- To: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
> We could tighten the wording not to say that a 200
> response can be treated as a 406 response where we
> mean to say "as a response to a request with a
> browser that is not supported". The browser's
> (non-)identification is likely to be based on the
> User-Agent and not on the accept HTTP headers.
Or use a 403-Forbidden response, which contrarily to
what its name indicates, seems to be a generic rejection
form of a request. The 403 response can be accompanied
with an explanatory text.
E.Casais
Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 14:50:25 UTC