Re: Comments on "Content Transformation Guidelines 1.0" ( LC-2097)

 Dear Barry Leiba ,

The Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Content Transformation
Guidelines 1.0 published on 1 Aug 2008. Thank you for having taken the time
to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-ct-guidelines-20091006/.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-bpwg-comments@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 6 November
2009. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific
solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a
consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a
formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the
transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation
Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group,
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
François Daoust
W3C Staff Contacts

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/30699C4F23997DA44793513C@Uranus-009002042072.watson.ibm.com
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-ct-guidelines-20080801/


=====

Your comment on the document as a whole:
> To the W3C Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group:
> 
> The Internet Architecture Board has reviewed the subject document, and
> notes that 
> it has previously reviewed related work done in the IETF in the Open
> Pluggable 
> Edge Services (OPES) Working Group.  In its preview and review of OPES
> work, the 
> IAB expressed its concerns about privacy, control, monitoring, and
> accountability 
> of such services in RFC 3238 [ http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3238 ].
> 
> We have no specific architectural concerns with the "Content
> Transformation 
> Guidelines" document as written; it does seem to take into account the
> questions 
> raised during the OPES discussions.  We would like, though, to make
> that explicit 
> by specifically documenting that you reviewed and considered the issues
> in RFC 
> 3238.
> 
> Barry Leiba, for the Internet Architecture Board ( http://iab.org )


Working Group Resolution (LC-2097):
Thanks very much for your comment. We make specific reference to OPES work
in the new revision.

----

Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2009 15:34:22 UTC