Re:

 Dear Jonathan Jeon ,

The Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the W3C mobileOK Basic
Tests 1.0 (2nd Last Call) published on 25 May 2007. Thank you for having
taken the time to review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070928/.

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 19 October 2007. In case of disagreement, you are requested to
provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working
Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the
opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the
Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the
W3C Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group,
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux
Michael(tm) Smith
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/20070719100930.62EA547BA3@mojo.w3.org
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070525/


=====

Your comment on 3.6 EXTERNAL_RESOURCES:
> 3.6 EXTERNAL_RESOURCES
> 
> Currently, the condition value is too small. So it is hard to  support
> normal UI with this condition.
> 
> It is proposed to increase the value, about 50 (this value derived from
> the statistical results of Korean CPs)
> 
> PROPOSED TEXT:
> ------------------------
> For each such resource:
>    Request the resource, and add one to a running count
>    Add to the count the number of HTTP redirects (HTTP 3xx status
> responses) that must be followed and authentication requests that must
> be made until the   resource itself is successfully retrieved
> If this total exceeds 20, warn
> If this total exceeds 50, FAIL
> PASS
> ------------------------
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-bpwg/2007Jul/0047.html


Working Group Resolution:
1) mobileOK Basic is supposed to be based on Best Practices doc and so we
must reflect its values, 2) nothing precludes delivering a 'fancy'
experience; mobileOK only asks you be able to create a 'non-fancy'
experience, 3) based on Google mobile web data the current numbers are
reasonable; we don't yet have data in support of higher limits

----

Received on Thursday, 4 October 2007 15:27:47 UTC