- From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:04:33 -0400
- To: "Johannes Koch" <koch@w3development.de>
- Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
I think your reading matches the intent here, yes. All of this would be considered if www.example.org was being tested. The final 200 result would be treated as the "real" document under test, but the cost associated with getting there would be accounted for. Sean On 7/4/07, Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de> wrote: > > Hi BPWG group, > > I just came around a situation where some requests were needed to get to > the final response, e.g. like this: > > request 1: http://www.example.org/ > response 1: 401 (needs authentication) > > request 2: http://www.example.org/ with authentication > response 2: 302 to http://www.example.com/ > > request 3: http://www.example.com/ > response 3: 401 (needs authentication) > > request 4: http://www.example.com/ with authentication > response 4: 200 > > According to section 2.3.3, responses 1, 3 and 4 should be tested. So > there is one (primary doc + included resources) to be tested for URI > http://www.example.org/, but two (primary docs + included resources) to > be tested for URI http://www.example.com/. Do you distinguish between > these two? Or do all three belong together? > > -- > Johannes Koch > In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum. > (Te Deum, 4th cent.) > >
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 21:04:44 UTC