Re: Re: Last Call on mobileOK Basic

 Dear Loretta Guarino Reid ,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the W3C mobileOK Basic
Tests 1.0 published on 30 Jan 2007. Thank you for having taken the time to
review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has
been implemented in the new version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070525/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 22 June 2007. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide
a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Michael(tm) Smith
W3C Staff Contact

 1.
http://www.w3.org/mid/824e742c0703051428j3ce84f83k23b7c25e953c483a@mail.gmail.com
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070130/


=====

Your comment on 1.1 Levels of mobileOK:
> We are concerned that the statement "Content which passes the tests
> has taken some steps to provide a functional user experience  for
> users of basic mobile devices whose capabilities at least match those
> of the Default Delivery Context (DDC)." would lead authors to conclude
> that these guidelines will also meet the basic functional needs of
> users with disabilities who use basic mobile devices. here is much in
> common but these guidelines do not cover all of WCAG. We recommend
> adding "To accommodate users with disabilities, WCAG should also be
> met.", or "You should follow other guidelines that are applicable to
> Web content, including the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines."


Working Group Resolution:
See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-bpwg/2007Mar/0176 for
updates following from this comment.

----

Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 14:14:12 UTC