- From: <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:14:00 +0000
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Dear Dominique Hazael-Massieux , The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the W3C mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0 published on 30 Jan 2007. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments! The Working Group's response to your comment is included below, and has been implemented in the new version of the document available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070525/ Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not before 22 June 2007. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track. Thanks, For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group, Michael(tm) Smith W3C Staff Contact 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/1175601277.4535.69.camel@cumulustier 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20070130/ ===== Your comment on 3.5 DEFAULT_INPUT_MODE: > It occurred to me that while mobileOK is encouraging the use of the > inputmode attribute [1], it doesn't make any check that the actual > value > of the inputmode matches what XHTML Basic 1.1 allows: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml-basic-20060705/#s_inputmode > > It is also pretty important given that the DTD doesn't actually > enforce > these values. Working Group Resolution: We will change the test to check that the value of the inputmode attribute is something valid. ----
Received on Monday, 4 June 2007 14:14:07 UTC