- From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 23:14:16 +0100
- To: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Hi there,
here are some editorial improvements for PR-mobile-bp-20061102.
Sometimes several statements are grouped under one heading. In most
cases the following tests are prefixed with the statement label. However
some are missing. I inserted the ones that I think should be added.
5.2.6.3 What to test
<ins>LINK_TARGET_ID </ins>Human Test: Check for proper descriptions
(e.g. no use of "Click here").
<ins>LINK_TARGET_FORMAT </ins>Machine Test: Check for links to non-HTML
formats.
BTW, HTML is not in a proper content format according to the default
delivery context in section 3.7. Should this be XHTML (Basic) instead?
5.2.8.2 What to test
AUTO_REFRESH, REDIRECTION: the content attribute may also contain a
number for the timeout, not just a URI. When used for a refresh, it is
quite normal to have only a number in the content attribute.
5.3.2.3 What to test
PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT: Only mentions markup and images. What about CSS or
script or other onload referenced resources?
5.3.3.3 What to test
Mentions a statement label "SCROLLING_LIMIT" which does not exists
anywhere else.
5.4.4.2 What to test
<ins>TABLES_NESTED </ins>Machine Test: Check that there are no nested
tables.
5.4.8.3 What to test
Mentions pixel/absolute values for font-size (CSS property), while the
statement also mentions markup language attribute values. What about
attributes that allow both numbers (pixles) or percentage values? What
about width and height CSS properties?
5.5.1.3 What to test
AVOID_FREE_TEXT, DEFAULT_INPUT_MODE: What about type="password"? The
type could also default to "text".
5.5.3.2 What to test
<ins>CONTROL_LABELLING </ins>Machine Test: Check if the label element is
used in forms.
Should the label be explicitly associated with a control (label/@for =
$control/@id)?
<ins>CONTROL_POSITION </ins>Human Test: Check whether the labels are
properly positioned with regard to the controls.
Some of the tests differ from the ones listed in WD-mobileOK-20060712.
But I think, as mobile-bp is the newer document, mobileOK will be
updated accordingly, right?
--
Johannes Koch
Spem in alium nunquam habui praeter in te, Deus Israel.
(Thomas Tallis, 40-part motet)
Received on Friday, 3 November 2006 22:14:33 UTC