- From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 23:14:16 +0100
- To: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Hi there, here are some editorial improvements for PR-mobile-bp-20061102. Sometimes several statements are grouped under one heading. In most cases the following tests are prefixed with the statement label. However some are missing. I inserted the ones that I think should be added. 5.2.6.3 What to test <ins>LINK_TARGET_ID </ins>Human Test: Check for proper descriptions (e.g. no use of "Click here"). <ins>LINK_TARGET_FORMAT </ins>Machine Test: Check for links to non-HTML formats. BTW, HTML is not in a proper content format according to the default delivery context in section 3.7. Should this be XHTML (Basic) instead? 5.2.8.2 What to test AUTO_REFRESH, REDIRECTION: the content attribute may also contain a number for the timeout, not just a URI. When used for a refresh, it is quite normal to have only a number in the content attribute. 5.3.2.3 What to test PAGE_SIZE_LIMIT: Only mentions markup and images. What about CSS or script or other onload referenced resources? 5.3.3.3 What to test Mentions a statement label "SCROLLING_LIMIT" which does not exists anywhere else. 5.4.4.2 What to test <ins>TABLES_NESTED </ins>Machine Test: Check that there are no nested tables. 5.4.8.3 What to test Mentions pixel/absolute values for font-size (CSS property), while the statement also mentions markup language attribute values. What about attributes that allow both numbers (pixles) or percentage values? What about width and height CSS properties? 5.5.1.3 What to test AVOID_FREE_TEXT, DEFAULT_INPUT_MODE: What about type="password"? The type could also default to "text". 5.5.3.2 What to test <ins>CONTROL_LABELLING </ins>Machine Test: Check if the label element is used in forms. Should the label be explicitly associated with a control (label/@for = $control/@id)? <ins>CONTROL_POSITION </ins>Human Test: Check whether the labels are properly positioned with regard to the controls. Some of the tests differ from the ones listed in WD-mobileOK-20060712. But I think, as mobile-bp is the newer document, mobileOK will be updated accordingly, right? -- Johannes Koch Spem in alium nunquam habui praeter in te, Deus Israel. (Thomas Tallis, 40-part motet)
Received on Friday, 3 November 2006 22:14:33 UTC