W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-comments@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: CR-mobile-bp-20060627

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:49:44 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0608160749m666531a2q3a73f92549675987@mail.google.com>
To: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org

First I apologize for not replying earlier and thank you for the
comments. The document is automatically generated with XSLT and the
result has some problems, but I believe they can be fixed.

I will bring up the point on GIF 89a/87a with the group in this week's
call. You are suggesting that we either specify GIF 87a only, or
specify 89a and allow for transparency?


On 8/1/06, Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> wrote:
> Hi, could you please "downgrade" this document to be visible
> with "any" browser ?  Some internal links apparently have no
> anchors, or their anchors have no name=, I didn't check the
> source.  I'd also appreciate it if you replace the three used
> non-ASCII characters by NCRs or symbolic references (&nbsp; in
> the table of contents).
> In section 3.7 (default delivery context) you allow JPEG and
> GIF 89a (non-interlaced, non-transparent, non-animated).  The
> latter would be almost the same as GIF 87a adding text chunks.
> What is a mobile device supposed to do with text in GIF 89a ?
> Or in other words, what's wrong with the transparency concept
> in GIF 89a ?
> Bye, Frank
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 14:50:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:08 UTC