- From: Miguel Garcia <miguel.garcia@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:25:06 +0700
- To: public-bpwg-access@w3.org
I've had a comment regarding the way Page Valet reports WCAG accessibility warnings. My correspondent[1] thinks it should mention any WCAG points that are untested, as this is how some other accessibility tools work and it makes Valet seems less complete[2]. As it stands, Page Valet will generate warnings when it detects an error (or potential error). When it applies a test that is passed it says nothing. When it doesn't apply a test, it says nothing. Now the suggestion is that is should - conceptually - test every point in the WCAG. In cases like #14.1/etc that self-evidently can't be tested by any tool, it should issue a nag message - whatever page is being tested. Now, I have several reasons not to apply this kind of completeness. But maybe I'm missing the wider view. -- -- GoldED/386 2.42.G0614+ I will try to live with love... with dreams... and forever with tears... http://www.w9statistics.org
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2008 11:25:22 UTC