W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg-access@w3.org > December 2007

Re: [STRUCTURE] in Comments on AccessibilityTF draft 0b

From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:16:19 +0100
Message-ID: <79cab0900712040116j247bc960s2695a377e9077a97@mail.gmail.com>
To: "MWI BPWG Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Cc: "Mobile Web Accessibility Task Force" <public-bpwg-access@w3.org>

On 17/10/2007, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote:
> [STRUCTURE] Use features of the markup language to indicate logical
> document structure
> CMN: Also WCAG 2.1, 3.6, 3.7, 5.1, 5.2, 6.1

Headings (CP 2.1) is covered in the WCAG section (using headings
allows avoiding reliance on color, but not vice versa).

Lists (CP 3.6), quotations (CP 3.7), data tables (CP 5.1 and 5.2) are
structural elements but they aren't mentioned in the BP. However there
is a "Structural Elements" link in the text that looks like it was
supposed to link to a section with a detailed list of them, but it
doesn't work as it links back to the same section. So while it may
have been the intention to widen the scope to include the other
structural elements, the reader will only read about section headings
and stop at that. So I think we can only claim that it meets WCAG CP

I have added that it helps conform to CP 6.1 "Organize documents so
they may be read without style sheets".



Email: achuter@technosite.es
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2007 09:16:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:06 UTC