- From: Jordi Paillissé Vilanova <jordip@ac.upc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:01:40 +0200
- To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>, Blockchain CG <public-blockchain@w3.org>
- Cc: Greg Adamson <g.adamson@ieee.org>
- Message-ID: <beee8af3-e762-2af9-eac9-af1a70e1a5f8@ac.upc.edu>
Hi Tim, It is an interesting idea, a small example of this is Primecoin, in which PoW is used to calculate prime numbers. But I think your idea goes beyond it. http://primecoin.io/ Regards, Jordi El 09/07/17 a les 11:38, Timothy Holborn ha escrit: > I stumbled across a post by Christopher Allen[1] and pondered the > concept of building a blockchain like method, that used compute tasks > for useful public purpose in addition to the value orientated outcome. > > Ie: useful purpose might be something like SETI[2]; but perhaps also > more flexible, so a marketplace of 'bounties' could be used to create > the economics around the compute. users/clients could select the > projects they want to do, like a share-trading platform. > > The output might also be a tradable 'normalised currency' like output > for the compute provider, like an amount of bitcoin or similar. > Theory was to figure out how that might bring about a more efficient > use of energy? may also be a means to extend something to be > inclusive of labour in addition to compute/processing/energy consumption. > > Yet, in the initial idea; was that 'smart actors' might use their > computational 'agents' to use the energy they consume to generate more > value than it cost them. bit like a knowledge/compute economy > framework... The economic outcome of a particularly hard problem > might be worth alot more overtime, contributors end-up with a proof of > stake, et.al <http://et.al>. > > just an idea, thoughts? any references? > > tim.h. > > [1] https://twitter.com/ChristopherA/status/883874266944491520 > [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SETI@home
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2017 10:48:30 UTC