- From: Marta Piekarska <marta@blockstream.io>
- Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:20:20 -0800
- To: Colleen Kirtland <cskirtland@yahoo.com>
- Cc: Marta <marta@blockstream.com>, Marta Piekarska <marta@blockstream.io>, Blockchain CG <public-blockchain@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <3AF67E57-7F83-4B96-BA82-7F2209732F02@blockstream.com>
Thanks Colleen, I’d definitely like to add this to the discussion. I have also added these questions to the Document so that can have everything in one place. Attached is the weekly snapshot. Live version can be found at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BNKQ-hNFIpROyzQRig7a7kTBcmclAQlbv3MCCZfhHiE/edit?usp=sharing
Have a good day m — Security Architect @ Blockstream mp@blockstream.com +491703311307 (Germany) +14159608938 (U.S.) Signal, Wickr (martap) > On Feb 13, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Colleen Kirtland <cskirtland@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Thanks for sending this out, Marta. I am preparing a list of use case elicitation questions whereby I hope to interview as many business partners as possible for viable use cases in Financial Services (Insurance/Annuities in my case). I don't know if these really belong in the document attached, but here is a start of the things I'd ask. This may help others seeking viable use cases. Tried to make these questions semi-business friendly. If it makes sense to the group, perhaps a 5 minute discussion next time will help expand upon this starter set. > > Thanks, Colleen > > Do you/we have a need for: > > Transactions that are irrevocable? (Transactions that can be proven to be irreversible?) > Transactions that where we need to prove that nothing was altered? > Where everyone who is a part of a “community” or block can see what has transpired? > Where we need to track tangible or intangible items/assets? > Where we want to drastically reduce the number of “middle men” and toll gates required in a current transaction? > Where there is a fixed pool of assets/objects that we want to ensure are not “spent” twice? > Where we want to transcend the jurisdictions of geography when transacting? > Where we care about highly secured methods of transacting? > > > On Friday, February 10, 2017 11:26 AM, Marta Piekarska <marta@blockstream.io> wrote: > > > Weekly snapshot > > Please contribute. I have added the role diagram. > > Have a great day > m > > > > — > Security Architect @ Blockstream > > mp@blockstream.com > > +491703311307 (Germany) > +14159608938 (U.S.) > Signal, Wickr (martap) > > > On Jan 11, 2017, at 9:45 PM, Lemieux, Victoria <v.lemieux@ubc.ca> wrote: > > > > Many thanks for sending this out Manu. > > > > Best wishes, > > Vicki. > >> On Jan 11, 2017, at 10:26 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> As promised in the Blockchain CG call, here is a template for our Use > >> Cases document: > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BNKQ-hNFIpROyzQRig7a7kTBcmclAQlbv3MCCZfhHiE/edit# > >> > >> We will eventually move this content into a proper W3C spec format, but > >> have found it useful to collaborate in Google Docs at the beginning > >> (instead of wiki or ReSpec) because: > >> > >> * It's easier to comment on text and make suggestions > >> * It's easier to suggest changes w/o changing the document text > >> * It's easier to get participation from non-technical contributors > >> > >> Anyone may make comments on the document above. Marta, Vicki, Vagner, > >> and I are editors of the document right now, but if you want to be added > >> as an editor, just ask. > >> > >> -- manu > >> > >> -- > >> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > >> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > >> blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built > >> http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/ > >> > > > > > >
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: W3CBlockchainCGUseCases-2.pdf
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2017 22:20:50 UTC