W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-blockchain@w3.org > September 2016

Re: Chainpoint Community Group Announcement

From: Mountie Lee <mountie@paygate.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:54:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CAE-+aYJrAPLRCXCTFzntCM5UaKMvL-6PT=zZaG_Y5aLUFd74uQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adán Sánchez de Pedro Crespo <adan@stampery.co>, Wayne Vaughan <wayne@tierion.com>, public-blockchain@w3.org
Cc: Douglas Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Jason Bukowski <jason@tierion.com>, Tom Kysar <tom@tierion.com>
at Web Payments WG
to remove central registry issue, URL based mechanism is introduced.
see Payment Method Identifier document :

2016년 9월 21일 (수) 오후 9:19, Mountie Lee <mountie@paygate.net>님이 작성:

> from previous experiences, groups(including CG, IG and WG) are very
> difficult to produce common governance rules specially for registry.
> this is one of the points CG can discuss.
> 2016년 9월 21일 (수) 18:48, Adán Sánchez de Pedro Crespo <adan@stampery.co>님이
> 작성:
>> Hi Mountie,
>> > could you switch document mode you attached
>> > to allowing comments?
>> Done! Sorry it was not allowed by default.
>> > how to cover or handle private chains?
>> > many groups are trying to handle blockchain privately with reduced
>> > difficulties.
>> > even some private chains has very low trust than the public chains.
>> > actually can not define it is blockchain.
>> That is a question that needs to be first faced from the "group scope"
>> perspective.
>> There is an ongoing heated debate on whether it really does make sense
>> to anchor data into a private blockchain.
>> Either way, it would be possible by using a URI anchor type as Wayne
>> just said—thanks for saving me the explanation ;)
>> > who and how define chainID?
>> The Community Group and eventually the Working Group should be in charge
>> of defining them. "How" will depend on the governance model chosen by
>> the group itself.
>> > some groups are not trying to load data on OP_RETURN script to reduce
>> > or postpone the tx fee to consumer side(meaning putting data on input
>> > script).
>> > who and how define anchor type?
>> That's a really good point. OP_RETURN is not the only way to anchor data
>> into the Bitcoin blockchain (e.g. OpenTimestamps).
>> In the case of Ethereum, AFAIK,  there are at least two different
>> methods as well.
>> Best,
>> --
>> Adán Sánchez de Pedro Crespo
>> CTO, Stampery Inc.
>> San Francisco - Madrid
>> T: +34 663 163 375
Received on Saturday, 24 September 2016 09:54:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:26 UTC