- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:53:26 -0400
- To: public-blockchain@w3.org
On 09/13/2016 12:29 PM, Doug Schepers wrote: > This conversation is interesting, but it's out of the scope of the > Blockchain CG. I'll stop talking about W3C process and focus on why I sent the mail to the group in the first place: Having been through this multiple times as W3C, I've found this checklist helpful in organizing work in Community Groups: http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/#checklist These are the potential work items I see: 1. Chainpoint 2. Linked Data Signatures (secp256k1 support) 3. Interoperable Data Model / Block Format 4. Basic Blockchain REST API Step #1 of the checklist is to clearly identify and articulate a problem statement around those 4 items (if folks agree that doing so is compelling). Before we do that... does this list resonate with folks? Is it missing something? Is there something on there that we shouldn't focus on? -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Rebalancing How the Web is Built http://manu.sporny.org/2016/rebalancing/
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2016 17:53:50 UTC