On 9 September 2016 at 20:41, Vicki Lemieux <vlemieux@mail.ubc.ca> wrote: > Hi All, I belong to an international research consortium, InterPARES > Trust, that has good experience in creating multi-lingual terminology > databases. See http://www.interpares.org/ip2/ip2_terminology_db.cfm. > Though the database doesn¹t relate to blockchain or web technologies, it > may provide a good model of process and output for us to follow. > Fantastic! Strongly agree with the sentiment here that collecting, categorizing and standardizing the common algorithms that secure a block chain is a great deliverable here. >From this naturally flows many use cases that these algorithms are already in use for. A meta topic may be the use of public vs private block chains via access control, but it makes sense to focus on the public first. > > Cheers, > Vicki. > > On 2016-09-09, 7:52 AM, "Adán Sánchez de Pedro Crespo" <adan@stampery.co> > wrote: > > >Malvin, thanks a lot for providing the references to RFC 6920 and the > >IANA register. > > > >Those two are really valuable resources to take into account, although > >they could use some updating to include most recent versions of the SHA > >family like SHA3 and, in the process, avoid naming confusion (e.g.: many > >people mix up SHA3-512 with SHA512, which is actually SHA2 with 512 bits > >output). > > > >-- > >*Adán Sánchez de Pedro Crespo* > >CTO, Stampery Inc. > >San Francisco - Madrid > >T: +34 663 163 375 > > > > >Received on Saturday, 10 September 2016 12:04:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:26 UTC