- From: Vicki Lemieux <vlemieux@mail.ubc.ca>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 11:24:58 -0700
- To: Adán Sánchez de Pedro Crespo <adan@stampery.co>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- CC: <public-blockchain@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
This sounds sensible to me. How should we go about creating the survey? Does it need validation by the TPAC? What should be the distribution channels? Cheers, Vicki On 2016-09-09, 3:19 AM, "Adán Sánchez de Pedro Crespo" <adan@stampery.co> wrote: >I agree, Manu's article is a great insight on how the standardization >process should work. > >The checklist seems very reasonable. Let's immediately start with point 1. > >We need to elaborate a survey covering which aspects of blockchain need >/ would benefit the most from standardization. This survery should also >identify problems, help us document use cases and invite interested >parties to join this CG. > >Manu is also right when pointing out that one of the areas that we have >already identified as potential object of standardization is data >anchoring proofs / receipts. In addition, there are some interesting >proposals about that matter on the table. > >That's a very good sign, because there are other aspects in the >blockchain space that are still too immature or nothing more than hype >and therefore there's nothing to discuss about them regarding >standardization. > >Best, >-- >*Adán Sánchez de Pedro Crespo* >CTO, Stampery Inc. >San Francisco - Madrid >T: +34 663 163 375 >
Received on Friday, 9 September 2016 18:25:51 UTC