- From: Mountie Lee <mountie@paygate.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 15:37:20 +0900
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-blockchain@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAE-+aY+jSnnve3P1up4Od0tVS7UBW1YipeeQvb8n3vZY4qGn6w@mail.gmail.com>
I have different but similar idea of blockchain identity. in some case, we need strong KYC for specific address which is actually owned by whom or organization. first approach was assign my blockchain address to internet domain and get EV-SSL certificate. letting user visit https://18PXYPJ2hLkRhsmHEyCDbRzbcdXBDD5ZxC.com to verify address ownership which were verified by trusted 3rd party. but Base58check encoding is case sensitive but domain is not case-sensitive. I know WonBeom had different approach at https://shepelt-github.gitbooks.io/openkeychain-spec/content/ <https://shepelt-github.gitbooks.io/openkeychain-spec/content/> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > I thought the discussion on global blockchain identity was quite > interesting. > > It seems to me that block chains contain several types of identifiers, > some for addresses, some for transactions, some for headers etc. > > I think in satoshi's original block chain the bitcoin:<address> type > indirect identifier makes a lot of sense. But in a true super ledger > probably should should be extensible to allow things like http addresses > and free form uris so that you can fund a web page, email address, phone > etc. > > Strangely for someone as smart as satoshi, he left the scheme off the > block chain, but I suppose this was necessary for compacting the blocks and > increasing transactions per second. > > I'd like to see a future where block chain technology and global identity > come together in an elegant way on the web. The best fit solution to me, > to date seems to be WebID, but I'd love to hear other views. > -- Mountie Lee PayGate CTO, CISSP Tel : +82 2 2140 2700 E-Mail : mountie@paygate.net
Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 06:38:10 UTC