- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:35:42 -0400
- To: Marta Piekarska <marta@blockstream.io>, public-blockchain@w3.org
Hi, folks– Based on Marta's background, willingness and ability to help, concrete plans, company support, and location in Europe, I think it makes a lot of sense to appoint her as a co-chair of the Blockchain Community Group. That would give us 3 co-chairs, well distributed geographically and culturally: * Youngwhan "Nick" Lee in Asia * Marta Piekarska in Europe * Doug Schepers in North America I've already floated this suggestion with Nick, and with others during the weekly Blockchain CG teleconferences, and everyone thought it was a good idea. If anyone has objections to this, please let the chairs know by the end of this week; if we don't hear any objections, we'll appoint her as co-chair. Thanks! Doug On 8/5/16 6:51 PM, Marta Piekarska wrote: > Hi Everyone!! I wanted to properly introduce myself. My name is Marta > Piekarska, I’m the Security Architect at Blockstream. I thought, that > since I am getting involved in all of the Blockchain work, and I > would love to help more with organizing the community group it would > be good for me to give you some background information. So here is my > standard spiel: > > I am a Bachelor of Electrical and Computer Engineering from Warsaw > University of Technology and a double Master from Computer Science > and Informatics at Technical University of Berlin and Warsaw > University of Technology. I did my undergrad Thesis on Voice > Encryption on Android Platform and my grad work on GPU-aided Payload > Delivery on Linux Kernel. I am currently finishing my PhD > dissertation on User-Informed Design of Privacy Tools, while working > for one of the hottest Silicon Valley startups, Blockstream, as their > Security Architect. Previously, I have been working at Deutsche > Telekom as the Lead Architect on the Future of Mobile Privacy, a > collaboration with Mozilla and Deutsche Telekom improving Firefox OS. > Of course, I also teach and work at the Unitiverity (Technical > University of Berlin). My technical interests are covered by what I > do - user-informed privacy and security, applications of Bitcoin > technology beyond cryptocurrency, and lock picking. Outside of work I > climbing, read latin-american novels and watch Emir Kusturica’s > movies. I also cook. A lot:) > > I was thinking what would be a good plan for our group and here is > what I came up with: > > After providing the Report and presenting it to the Board of the W3C, > in August, we should plan to organize a meeting during the TPAC in > Lisbon. It will take place on Tuesday 20th of September at > 10:30–12:30, or thats the slot currently allocated in the agenda. It > makes sense for us to continue to work closely together with the > Blockchain Digital Assets Community Group, and participate in the > Interledger Payments Community Group meeting at TPAC on Thursday, > 23rd of September. Moreover we should collaborate with the Verifiable > Claims Working Group that is in the process of being currently > formed. > > I think that Blockchain is a technology that will be appearing in > many domains and the two biggest tasks I see for our team is to: 1) > monitor the work of other groups (Web Payment, Internet of Things > etc) to make sure we are aware of what is happening in their field. > 2) propose use cases beyond what is happening in the other working > groups and make sure we can identify the applications of Blockchain > that do and do not make sense. It was clear from the various > discussions during the workshop that there is a consensus among the > participants that not every application of Blockchain technology > makes sense. But we have not yet reached a point where we could > identify a common set of the “unreasonable” applications. > > Until TPAC meeting I would work with everyone to prepare agenda for > the meeting and see how can we best use the time we have together in > Lisbon. > > Next, after September meeting we could continue with regular calls, > and plan to convert into a Blockchain Working Group that can have > more formalized character and bigger impact. With that we could also > continue to plan our second workshop on the West Coast, this time, > where we would be working on more technical aspects and > specifications that can contribute to W3C standardization. > > Finally, by the end of the year I would hope we will have a > Blockchain Working Group and our first RFC. > > How does that sound to everyone? > > I would be happy to answer any questions and discuss more. Below you > have all of my contact details, feel free to hit me up about > anything! > > Have a great day m > > > — Security Architect @ Blockstream > > mp@blockstream.com > > +491703311307 (Germany) +14159608938 (U.S.) Signal, Wickr (martap) >
Received on Monday, 15 August 2016 15:35:47 UTC