- From: Neha Narula <narula@csail.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 16:59:21 -0400
- To: Daniel Buchner <Daniel.Buchner@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Blockchain Workshop <public-blockchain-workshop@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADoRLC2h3S5x3T6Acohu053qZ6R_oWHZeB-RyKaoZoAmVYGVkw@mail.gmail.com>
I'd like to suggest that scalability is a non-topic for the workshop. First of all, a lot of people misuse the word -- it has a specific meaning about resource usage (if you 2x the resources, you can do 2x the stuff*). What we actually care about is probably user-perceived latency. Second, there's a much bigger debate happening here and I don't think we'll have the expertise at the workshop to really get into it, nor do I think it would be a good use of our time. - Neha *Yes, I realize the ship has probably sailed and I should deal with the fact that people use it in a different way. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Daniel Buchner < Daniel.Buchner@microsoft.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > > > I am mulling a decision between two topics for submission and I wondered > if you all might provide some feedback on which you feel would be most > interesting for the workshop. Below each I have included the major > questions/content that would be answered/included: > > > > 1. What will humans, products, and services require of a > blockchain-based identity system? > > · How the necessity for human-friendly experiences impacts > requirements? > > · What products and services will need to do interesting things > for users? > > · How does agency and delegation of activities impact such a > system? > > > > 2. Brass tacks for what does and doesn’t go on a blockchain > > · What does putting something on a blockchain **actually** provide? > > · Issues with scalability of on-chain activities > > · Suggestions for how to leverage blockchains appropriately > -- http://nehanaru.la | @neha
Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2016 21:00:11 UTC