- From: Jerven Bolleman <jerven.bolleman@sib.swiss>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 12:01:07 +0100
- To: public-bioschemas@w3.org
Hi Franck, On 2/14/19 9:53 PM, Franck Michel wrote: > Dear all, > > In the biodiversity group we have defined a Taxon type. Taxa are usually > part of taxonomic registries. So I'm wondering how to mark up a web page > describing or referring to a given taxon while denoting that this taxon > is part of a taxonomic registry. > > Looking further in Bioschemas types, I see several ways of doing this, > and I guess this question applies equally to other types. If you think of a Taxon as a subclass of schema:CreativeWork then you can use schema:hasPart/schema:partof. Or preferably a richer subpropertyof, which means making a TaxonomicRegistry type in practice. > > We can think of a taxonomic registry as a schema.org/Dataset. In this > context, each taxon would be a DataRecord, but how do we relate a > DataRecord to its Dataset? > > We can also think of a taxonomic registry as a DataCatalog wherein taxa > would be Datasets (property includedInDataCatalog). > > Could the datasets group on shed light on this? Also what about how the > other groups have coped with this? I would not try too fit it into the Dataset/Catalog box as they aren't the way that the search engines expect them to be. Regards, Jerven > > Thx, > Franck. > > -- > signature > > Franck MICHEL - CNRS research engineer > Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Inria > I3S laboratory (UMR 7271) > franck.michel@cnrs.fr <mailto:franck.michel@cnrs.fr> - +33 (0)4 8915 4277 >
Received on Monday, 18 February 2019 11:01:40 UTC