Re: Paris BioHackathon proposal

Hi Melanie,

I will remove your name from the general Bioschemas proposal then.

About coordinating agendas, maybe no need. Ideally this hackathon will 
happen in a big room so everybody will be there, available to cross 
between groups as needed and wanted.

Cheers,


On 21/05/2018 16:45, Melanie Courtot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Luca and I are preparing another proposal, so while we would like to 
> be involved in this one I don’t know how feasible it is? Happy to 
> defer to your judgement - it would be good to at least have some 
> feedback on the samples spec.
>
> On a related note, the proposal we are working on leverages some of 
> the work we have done with our MarRef colleagues and the crawler built 
> by Justin by using Bioschemas to fetch external data, and it would be 
> good if those portions were not overlapping during the week so that 
> some bioschemas people were able to attend. Maybe we can try and 
> coordinate agendas a little bit closer to the time?
>
> Cheers,
> Melanie
>
>> On 21 May 2018, at 15:25, Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:justinccdev@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 21 May 2018 at 10:32, LJ Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk 
>> <mailto:ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>     Dear all,
>>
>>     The proposal for the Paris BioHackthon is available at
>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q2SL2jHWwmhK-T57YyPmViq1zifKT1bEtiZUTuheNQA/edit
>>
>>
>>
>>     Thanks all for your comments, suggestions and editions. Still some
>>     things to finish up. Deadline in Wed the 23rd of May.
>>
>>     @Alasdair, @Carole, @Rafael, could you please choose a name for
>>     the main
>>     contact person?
>>
>>     @Justin, please resolve those comments that you created and have
>>     been
>>     clarified/resolved already so we can focus on those still pending.
>>
>>
>> Have done.  Thanks for answering these.  Apologies for the repetitive 
>> question but I was keen to understand all the project names and terms 
>> in this section.
>>
>> I think the remaining issue may now be the expected outcomes box.  
>> The character limit is 500 and it's more than triple this at the 
>> moment.  Hence my suggestion to focus it on general themes, which 
>> perhaps the leaders could lead.  But I appreciate hackers might be 
>> looking for technical keywords and project names instead, so if we 
>> want to take that approach then maybe this just has to become a big 
>> word list, more or less.
>>
>>
>>     @Alasdair, @Dominique, @Justin, @Melanie Could you please confirm
>>     whether you want to be named as leaders here?
>>
>>
>> For my part, yes.
>>
>>
>>     @everybody. Would any of you prefer to send a separate proposal
>>     focus on
>>     some specific aspect of Bioschemas? If so, please let us know and
>>     remove
>>     any related text from this current all-in-one Bioschemas proposal.
>>
>>     Kind regards,
>>
>>
>

Received on Monday, 21 May 2018 15:48:41 UTC