- From: Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:32:13 +0000
- To: "Gray, Alasdair J G" <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
- Cc: "public-bioschemas@w3.org" <public-bioschemas@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAME9NR-UDhk-2mJyZf_ZqmMbd2dv4eGykxKm0k18f_cTtR8iLg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Gray, Alasdair J G <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 17 Nov 2017, at 15:03, Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Alasdair, can I clarify what you mean by > > "2. Data providers will also be free to provide additional terms with the > same meaning.” > > I had something different in mind. When validating a markup against a > profile you have the choice of being > > - “closed” – meaning that only terms that are expected are acceptable, > or > - “open” – meaning that additional terms are acceptable > > I was thinking that validation would be done in an open way, i.e. not > reporting errors if additional terms are provided. > I think "open" is fine for validation. That gives leeway to usecases that aren't just general findability, and maybe helps consensus on new properties to emerge. > > Does this refer to a profile providing term mappings (as raised by Michel, > Philippe and others) contributed by different data providers (profile > creation participants)? > > > With regard to mapping, is this something that Bioschemas should be > maintaining or should we be encouraging the use of services like Bioportal > and OLS for this purpose? > For me, the important thing is that the generation process is people coming together within Bioschemas. I think it would be great if the actual mapping data itself is hosted by OLS/Bioportal. My concern is that mapping algorithms aren't currently good enough simply to let the machines work it out (love to be proved wrong), and that needing automated mapping raises the complexity/cost of creating applications. > Alasdair > > Alasdair J G Gray > > Fellow of the Higher Education Academy > Assistant Professor in Computer Science, > School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences > (Athena SWAN Bronze Award) > Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh UK. > > Email: A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk > Web: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ajg33 > ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-4872 > Office: Earl Mountbatten Building 1.39 > Twitter: @gray_alasdair > > ------------------------------ > > *Heriot-Watt University is The Times & The Sunday Times International > University of the Year 2018* > > Founded in 1821, Heriot-Watt is a leader in ideas and solutions. With > campuses and students across the entire globe we span the world, delivering > innovation and educational excellence in business, engineering, design and > the physical, social and life sciences. > > This email is generated from the Heriot-Watt University Group, which > includes: > > 1. Heriot-Watt University, a Scottish charity registered under number > SC000278 > 2. Edinburgh Business School a Charity Registered in Scotland, > SC026900. Edinburgh Business School is a company limited by guarantee, > registered in Scotland with registered number SC173556 and registered > office at Heriot-Watt University Finance Office, Riccarton, Currie, > Midlothian, EH14 4AS > 3. Heriot- Watt Services Limited (Oriam), Scotland's national > performance centre for sport. Heriot-Watt Services Limited is a private > limited company registered is Scotland with registered number SC271030 and > registered office at Research & Enterprise Services Heriot-Watt University, > Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS. > > The contents (including any attachments) are confidential. If you are not > the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should > please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any > attachments) from your system. >
Received on Friday, 17 November 2017 15:33:01 UTC