- From: ljgarcia <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:41:45 +0100
- To: "Carlos Horro (EI)" <Carlos.Horro@earlham.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-bioschemas@w3.org, "Wiktor Jurkowski (EI)" <Wiktor.Jurkowski@earlham.ac.uk>, "Annemarie Eckes (EI)" <Annemarie.Eckes@earlham.ac.uk>
Hi, I would say "investigation" is not a biological type. You have there, for instance, people participating in the investigation, starting day, grant, and so on that just does not fit withing BiologicalEntity. Is there something more appropriate in schema.org? Regards, On 2017-06-21 12:00, Carlos Horro (EI) wrote: > Hi, > > We have defined BiologicalEntity - Phenotypes use cases, and we would > be interested on one case about searching for an investigation (ie. by > its name or description) and obtaining information about it , > organisations and others. For mapping this case to BioSchemas, > BiologicalType would have to support something like 'Investigation', > which it's not currently supported... would it be OK? do I include it > into the biologicalType description? > > I think the question it would be similar with other use cases we need, > as Trials, Cultivars or Traits... > > Greetings, > > Carlos
Received on Thursday, 22 June 2017 11:42:14 UTC