- From: Alexandre Bertails <alexandre@bertails.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 09:44:08 -0500
- To: antonkulaga@gmail.com
- Cc: Alistair Johnson <a.johnson@easli.com>, "public-banana-rdf@w3.org" <public-banana-rdf@w3.org>, "rickynils@gmail.com" <rickynils@gmail.com>, "lars.hupel@mytum.de" <lars.hupel@mytum.de>
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Anton Kulaga <antonkulaga@gmail.com> wrote: > To be honest I did not get why zcheck is needed if scalacheck is ported to > scalajs. Maybe it is better to add additional (scalajs specific) part of > classes and documentation to scalacheck instead? Most (all?) of the tests in banana-rdf don't use property-based testing yet. The priority for us is to port the existing tests to something that can target Scala and Scala-JS, reunifying the duplicated ones. And after having updated quite a few tests for the past two days, I think zcheck does a great job for us. As for scalacheck, I am not sure it would make sense to have something like SpecLite in it, which is not about property-testing... Also, having zcheck as a separate entity lets us make experimentations. Alexandre > > 2014-11-29 17:30 GMT+02:00 Alistair Johnson <a.johnson@easli.com>: >> >> Overall reply would be that this is the first cut of the code - >> documentation, attribution, etc left for later. >> >> That said, I cc'ed Lars and Rickard to explicitly point out their (and >> their groups) contribution to the tiny wrapper library. And if the library >> is moved (as it perhaps should be) we can fill in the details then. >> >> Alistair >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: bertails@gmail.com [mailto:bertails@gmail.com] On Behalf Of >> Alexandre Bertails >> Sent: 29 November 2014 15:40 >> To: Alistair Johnson >> Cc: public-banana-rdf@w3.org; rickynils@gmail.com; lars.hupel@mytum.de >> Subject: Re: Towards 0.7.1 >> >> Alistair, >> >> I have a few remarks and questions. >> >> On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Alistair Johnson >> <Alistair.Johnson@johnsonusm.com> wrote: >> > All, >> > >> > >> > >> > I have released a new version of sbt-scalajs[1] that has the required >> > functionality for the release process. >> > >> > >> > >> > Additionally, I have been in contact with Rickard Nilsson, the >> > maintainer of scalacheck[2], whom has (quickly) released a new version >> > that cross builds to scalajs; this is already in master. As a result, >> > I have produced a new library zCheck[3] that wraps scalacheck and >> > scalaz’s Speclite >> >> I see that the SpecLite code is just copied, without attribution nor >> citing the license [1]. Also, I note that the package name was changed from >> scalaz to zcheck. >> >> I see that Lars was cc-ed, and I am wondering if he has suggestions to >> make there. >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/scalaz/scalaz/blob/series/7.2.x/project/build.scala#L132 >> >> > in a >> > cross-compile format for use in banans-rdf and potentially other >> > projects. >> > An obvious target, directly or indirectly, would be scalaz and >> > shapelessas we are also committed to help them provide scalajs builds in >> > their master. >> >> Is there interest in the scalaz community to release SpecLite as a >> separate library with scala-js support? I believe that would be the right >> place for zcheck. >> >> Alistair, I will be on IRC today most of today. Let's discuss the >> integration, I think I need your new toy this week-end :-) >> >> Alexandre >> >> > >> > >> > >> > I will next import zCheck into banana-rdf – please have a look at the >> > plugin/library in the meantime. >> > >> > >> > >> > Kind regards >> > >> > Alistair >> > >> > >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/InTheNow/sbt-scalajs >> > >> > [2] https://github.com/rickynils/scalacheck >> > >> > [3] https://github.com/InTheNow/zcheck, >> > https://bintray.com/inthenow/releases >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Anton Kulaga
Received on Monday, 1 December 2014 14:44:36 UTC