Re: superimposing the Fielding and TBL architectures

On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 17:49 -0400, Jonathan Rees wrote:
. . .
> Now let C be any class. Say that C is ≤-closed if the following holds:
>     for all generic resources g and h, C(g) and h ≤ g imply C(h).
> (One might say C is "heritable under specialization".)

Can you explain your notation please?  You said C is a class, but "C(g)"
looks like you are treating C as a predicate or function.  What do you
mean by "C(g)"?



-- 
David Booth, Ph.D.
http://dbooth.org/

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.

Received on Thursday, 6 October 2011 02:55:56 UTC