Thursday, 31 March 2011
- Re: a different way to interpret URIs that confuse IRs with their subjects
- Re: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-03-29
Wednesday, 30 March 2011
- Re: a different way to interpret URIs that confuse IRs with their subjects
- a different way to interpret URIs that confuse IRs with their subjects
Tuesday, 29 March 2011
- Draft minutes from 29-Mar-2011 teleconference
- Re: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-03-29
- Re: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-03-29
- Re: new AWWSW home page
- Re: new AWWSW home page
Monday, 28 March 2011
Saturday, 26 March 2011
Thursday, 24 March 2011
- AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-03-29
- Re: mini issue-57 doc feedback - p2
- Re: [Fwd: Nodes and Arcs]
- Re: mini issue-57 doc feedback
- [Fwd: Nodes and Arcs]
- mini issue-57 doc feedback - p2
- mini issue-57 doc feedback
Wednesday, 23 March 2011
Tuesday, 22 March 2011
Monday, 21 March 2011
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: new dated version of "how to refer"
- new dated version of "how to refer"
Sunday, 20 March 2011
Saturday, 19 March 2011
- Re: Identifying photocopy machine poses problem for Cuyahoga County official
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: Identifying photocopy machine poses problem for Cuyahoga County official
- Identifying photocopy machine poses problem for Cuyahoga County official
Friday, 18 March 2011
- [Fwd: +blank node identifiers was- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"]
- Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- [Fwd: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"]
Wednesday, 16 March 2011
- Sandro's 2002 article "Disambiguating RDF Identifiers"
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
Tuesday, 15 March 2011
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
- Re: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-03-15
Monday, 14 March 2011
- Re: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-03-15
- Re: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-03-15
- please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon
Thursday, 10 March 2011
Tuesday, 8 March 2011
Monday, 7 March 2011
- Re: draft plan for moving forward on 200/303
- Re: Harvesting from Roy's paper
- Re: Harvesting from Roy's paper
- Re: Harvesting from Roy's paper
- Re: Harvesting from Roy's paper
- Re: Harvesting from Roy's paper
- Re: Harvesting from Roy's paper
- Harvesting from Roy's paper
Saturday, 5 March 2011
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
- Re: Diagram of it all
Friday, 4 March 2011
- Re: Roy's definition of a REST resource as a "Curried" form of ftrr:IR
- Diagram of it all
- Re: Roy's definition of a REST resource as a "Curried" form of ftrr:IR
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: Requirements for Any Theory of "Information Resource"
- Re: Resource identity of GETable URIs [Was Re: the mistake I made! ]
- Re: Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand
- Re: Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand
- Re: Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand
- Re: Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand
- Re: Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand
- Re: Roy's definition of a REST resource as a "Curried" form of ftrr:IR
- Re: Roy's definition of a REST resource as a "Curried" form of ftrr:IR
- Re: Roy's definition of a REST resource as a "Curried" form of ftrr:IR
- Re: Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand
- Re: Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand
- Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand
- Re: Resource identity of GETable URIs [Was Re: the mistake I made! ]
- Re: summary so far.
- out of band
- Universally constraining interpretations [was Re: summary so far.]
- Re: summary so far.
- Latest views
- Re: summary so far.
- Resource identity of GETable URIs [Was Re: the mistake I made! ]
- Re: the mistake I made! - was Re: proposed change to a spec
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: Requirements for Any Theory of "Information Resource"
- Re: Using the term "representation" bidirectionally [was Re: the mistake I made! ]
- Re: Roy's definition of a REST resource as a "Curried" form of ftrr:IR
- Re: Using the term "representation" bidirectionally [was Re: the mistake I made! ]
- Using the term "representation" bidirectionally [was Re: the mistake I made! ]
- Roy's definition of a REST resource as a "Curried" form of ftrr:IR
Thursday, 3 March 2011
Wednesday, 2 March 2011
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: summary so far.
- Re: hold up
- Re: summary so far.
- summary so far.
Tuesday, 1 March 2011
- Minutes from today's call
- URI Meaning & Fixed resources summary
- Re: the mistake I made! - was Re: proposed change to a spec
- Re: Requirements for Any Theory of "Information Resource"
- Re: the mistake I made! - was Re: proposed change to a spec
- the mistake I made! - was Re: proposed change to a spec
- Re: Requirements for Any Theory of "Information Resource"
- Re: proposed change to a spec