- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 01:43:22 -0500
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
I have to call you on this one, Alan ... On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:32 AM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:06 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: >> >> I am not advocating that anything be considered truth. Truth is >> irrelevant here. This is about system design -- not philosophy. > > We differ, probably irreparably, here. I am a system builder and have > been one for a long time. Certainly in my case truth matters. And so do you really mean to claim that the rigid distinction between continuants and occurrents, built into OBO, is **true** ? Some day you must explain to me, over a beer, which part of current physics accounts for how there can be two different ways to be embedded in time. Pat ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 06:43:58 UTC