Re: [Fwd: Reversing HTTP Range 14 and SemWeb Cool URIs decision] from Nathan on 2011-01-20 (public-awwsw@w3.org from January 2011)

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:24:52 +0000
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
CC: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4D38B634.5060309@webr3.org>

Jonathan Rees wrote:
> 1. how would you refer to a web page, defensively, if you didn't know
> how the receiving agent was going to interpret 200-yielding URIs
> (httpRange-14 vs. whatever)?  (using terms from the awwsw vocabulary,
> I would presume.)
> 2. is there any practical reason to choose the httpRange-14 rule over
> some other rule? (I believe there is - e.g. it gives an easy way to
> write metadata and metadata is good.)
> 3. advise the TAG on PR or other followup regarding the httpRange-14 rule

a wise decision :)

Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 22:26:02 UTC