Re: nathans definition of an IR

On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 01:16 +0000, Nathan wrote:
> even shorter:
> 
>    IR = something you could potentially GET a copy of

That sounds like it is trying to go down the same path as the existing
AWWW definition of IR
http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#def-information-resource





-- 
David Booth, Ph.D.
http://dbooth.org/

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of his employer.

Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 03:08:23 UTC