Re: AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-04-12

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> wrote:
> As I said earlier I'd like to try to decide on Tuesday whether the
> issue 57 document is to be a JAR document or an AWWSW document.
>
> I'll be doing some more work on it tomorrow (Friday) and maybe over
> the weekend. Then I'll freeze on Sunday, and then start keeping a
> change log, if I make any changes between Sunday and Tuesday.

Frozen: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/issue57/20110410/

> Planned changes:
>  - Flesh out paragraphs that are incomplete
>  - Say a bit about the conneg / fragids rathole (as a hash URI weakness)
>  - Add diagrams for 5.5 and 5.6 (but otherwise I'll try to avoid
> rewrites, as I'm pretty happy with the way they are)

Was too busy this weekend with family stuff, didn't get around to this.

Jonathan

> I ought to do this but probably won't get around to it:
>  - look at SWBP vocabularies and cool uris for semweb notes for
> inspiration on topics and tone (or something to react to / clarify)
>
> I still haven't gotten the critical readings I had hoped for; I guess
> everyone really is tired of the subject. I think I'm at a point of
> diminishing returns trying to do this in AWWSW. My hope is that by
> announcing on www-tag I'll get some fresh help.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/issue57/latest/
>
> Best
> Jonathan
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
> Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:08 PM
> Subject: Re: getting the nose-following document out the door
> To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
>
> [...]
> I think what I'd like to do is aim for some kind of AWWSW decision on
> endorsing this thing at our next telecon (April 12). If there is
> agreement (perhaps subject to conditions), I'll plan to ship it as an
> AWWSW document. Otherwise, I think I'll have it be a personal draft,
> since I know how hard it is to get even two people to agree on
> something.
>
> I'm very bad at finishing documents, as some of you may remember with
> the HCLS URI note; I generally need help in the form of critical
> readers telling me the obvious problems I don't see. I can proceed
> without, but the process is slower and the product poorer.
>
> Jonathan
>

Received on Monday, 11 April 2011 03:18:35 UTC