- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:51:06 -0500
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
On Thu, 2010-11-11 at 17:23 -0500, Jonathan Rees wrote:
> [ . . . ] could enumerate lots of properties ("content properties") that I
> think should follow the universal quantification rule - e.g. most or
> all of the DC and BIBO properties - but (in light of the negations of
> these properties) I don't know how to enable someone else to
> generalize to additional properties, i.e. what the boundaries of the
> meta-category of content properties are.
>
> Before spending a lot of time trying to figure that out, though, I
> want to convince at least one other person that this idea (universal
> quantification to extend representation properties to IR properties)
> has promise as a possible way to motivate the httpRange-14 rule.
I don't follow this at all. How would it motivate the httpRange-14
rule?
--
David Booth, Ph.D.
Cleveland Clinic (contractor)
http://dbooth.org/
Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 21:51:35 UTC