- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:36:38 -0500
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: nathan@webr3.org, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
This sounds interesting, but I don't understand: What does this have to do with the Architecture of the World Wide Semantic Web? David On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 17:18 -0500, Jonathan Rees wrote: > I'm still not so sure it's safe in the simplest case. The javascript > (attacker) can choose to send user credentials including cookies. This > seems risky in general, and I would think that encouraging even > minimal use of CORS could lead to trouble, perhaps not directly > related to the problem you thought you were solving. Maybe it is > sometimes safe in this particular situation (promise there are no > credentials set or used at the site!), but a few WG members think it's > dangerous and as I say it hasn't gotten proper review. You're playing > with fire. > > Related: http://codebutler.com/firesheep > > Jonathan > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > > Michael Hausenblas wrote: > >> > >> Hmmmm. I guess what we want to communicate and advocate for (and I agree > >> we > >> could make this even more explicit) is: IF you have open (==publically > >> available) data, use CORS and *not* use CORS for everything no matter > >> what. > > > > Perhaps we just need to focus on Access-Control-Allow-Origin then, because > > that is in CORS and UMP, and XMLHttpRequest and XDomainRequest, and thus - > > everywhere, and indeed it's the only one stable bit of all of this which is > > in all specs and supported at web-scale. > > > > That's all we require for "read", and all that's required for linked data, > > so perhaps some nice wording around Access-Control-Allow-Origin together > > with a disclaimer that "cors" is referenced because it's the most well known > > spec. > > > > The message remains the same, while being pre-cr compatible. > > > > Sound Okay? > > > > ps: would that be enough of a reason to warrant adding support on w3.org > > vocabs? > > > > pps: don't think I can post to awwsw, hence you may have to fwd as > > appropriate. > > > > Best, > > > > Nathan > > > > > -- David Booth, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic (contractor) http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 18:37:07 UTC