- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 08:39:39 -0500
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 01:15 -0500, Pat Hayes wrote: > On May 17, 2010, at 4:40 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote: [...] > > Note on time > > > > Although W is time-sensitive, we'll ignore time as it is not > > helpful to account for it right now. later we'll redo the > > treatment to take time into account. > > > > So W is OK as a binary relation for now. Later it might be > > W(X,R,t). > > Or it can still be binary, but X can be timesliced: W(s(X, t), R). I > would recommend this as a stronger (more expressive) way to deal with > time. Nifty. Yes, I prefer that approach too. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 24 May 2010 13:38:11 UTC