- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:27:54 -0400
- To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
I collected my thoughts on this question and put them here: http://esw.w3.org/Awwsw200OkResources So far I think this supports Alan R's approach, which is that 'information resource' is not a natural category and someone just needs to say what the has-webarch-representation relation is, not in general but on a case-by-case basis. Asking "when is x a webarch-representation of y?" is more productive than asking "what is an information resource", as e.g. it surfaces the idea that a description of a document is not a webarch-representation of the document (unless it is pathologically self-describing), something that httpRange-14 does not explain. But as far as I can tell so far, ad hoc, type specific assumptions have to be made in order to answer the question. Still hoping I'm wrong. Jonathan
Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 15:28:27 UTC