- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 02:04:02 -0400
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <29af5e2d0909012304q939c726sac881aa9f1403dab@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jonathan Rees writes: > > > The main problem I see is "A 303 response to a GET request indicates > > that the requested resource does not have a representation of its own > > that can be transferred by the server over HTTP." which directly > > contradicts the httpRange-14 resolution. > > Doesn't contradict it as far as I can tell. Â It would perhaps be > better if it said "the server does not have a representation for the > requested resource that can be transferred. . .", but that doesn't > change the condition, just makes its server-depenence clearer. > It implies that all resources are the sorts of things that *can* "have representations of their own". And if resource means *anything*, then there is a contradiction because there are things for which it makes no sense that *they* can possibly have anything about *themselves* that have to do with representations. Like potatoes. -Alan > > > Suppose I have an ontology that defines some number of URIs > > (i.e. tells you, as best it can, what they should refer to). The > > URIs are not hash URIs. Now I am deploying a server for those > > URIs. The TAG tells me that I can use 303, but HTTPbis tells me I > > can only do a 303 if the server doesn't have a representation of the > > referred-to resource. How on earth am I, the server administrator, > > supposed to decide that question for every resource? > > Simply determine whether if you _didn't_ give a 303, would your normal > URI->representation mapping give a result or not. > > > I have to do a cross product: For each representation that I have, > > and for each resource in the ontology, is the representation a > > representation of that resource? > > Reading the proposed text that way seems sea-lawyerish in the > extreme. Would you be happier if the same text as is used in 8.4.5 > *404 Not Found* was used, i.e. > > 303 response to a GET request indicates that the server has not > found anything matching the request-target. > > ? > > ht > - -- > Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh > Half-time member of W3C Team > 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged > spam] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFKnXF+kjnJixAXWBoRAtUNAJ0TjNoj8g0j8PgXRavZ6RAJbTbgjACfcGXo > uPsGef67yEXBOqdfioSEomc= > =TB7C > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2009 06:05:02 UTC