- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:29:25 -0400
- To: hhalpin@w3.org
- Cc: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM, <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote: > Jonathan > > Are we meeting again tomorrow, and if so, at what time? > Sorry, this doesn't seem to be written down anywhere! I hadn't sent an announcement yet, my bad. Been busy. 9am EDT, usual place. I haven't made much progress, but it's probably worth a brief checkin and action item review. If we have nothing else, one thing I've been wanting to talk about is this: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-07 : The semantics are that the identified resource is located at the server listening for TCP connections on that port of that host... and this: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-07#section-8.3.8 : The requested resource resides temporarily under a different URI. My question is what semantics can be imputed to "located at" and "resides under". Or are they so vague that we should just say cafeteria-style what one might *choose* to understand by these. Or do we ask HTTPbis to fix them somehow? They seem to be at odds with what HTTPbis says about 303+GET.
Received on Monday, 12 October 2009 16:29:58 UTC