- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:14:31 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>, AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
On 2/3/09 07:23, Pat Hayes wrote: > And one of the best ways to get some experience is for as many people as > possible to be trying to model things in as many ways as possible, and > we will all see which ways work well and which ways don't. Which is > exactly what people developing SWeb applications using RDF are trying to > do. No doubt many of these will be flops, because of poor modeling > decisions. But I want to /discover/ what works and what doesn't, rather > than try to influence or, God forbid, legislate by fiat what I or anyone > else thinks are "good" modeling styles. None of us know yet what is good > and what isn't. The formalisms continue to surprise us. Can you say a little more about how you see this working? How would we recognise if things were "working well" or not? What was flopping? cheers, Dan
Received on Monday, 2 March 2009 21:15:15 UTC