Re: Use Cases and Requirements for Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0

Jonathan,

As a member of the Media Fragments WG that closely works together with the
Annotation group, I've reviewed this document recently (and gave feedback at
recent F2F re their usage of information resources, etc.). Now, I'm
wondering what precisely you mean? Which section caught your attention?

Cheers,
      Michael

PS: You rdfs.org account should be available soon ;)

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/


> From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:07:55 -0400
> To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
> Subject: Use Cases and Requirements for Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0
> Resent-From: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:08:36 +0000
> 
> The following might be of some interest to this group.
> 
> Use Cases and Requirements for Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0
> W3C Working Draft 04 June 2009
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-annot-reqs-20090604/
> 
> This also makes me think of POWDER, which I ought to add to the little
> list of related efforts that I sometimes include in my email messages.
> 
> Jonathan
>

Received on Thursday, 11 June 2009 12:36:23 UTC