- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:08:52 +0000
- To: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Sorry, I cannot make this one, as I'll be traveling. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Statements made herein represent the views of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of HP unless explicitly so stated. > -----Original Message----- > From: public-awwsw-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-awwsw-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rees > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 7:45 AM > To: public-awwsw@w3.org > Subject: AWWSW telecon, Tues Feb 17 > > > Harry, did you say you'd have something for us to look at for our next > call? If you send it soon, we can talk about it. > > Otherwise, I would like to suggest we continue with HTTP. My latest > thought is that RFC 2616 really has two layers, a transport spec > consisting of MUSTs, and a REST theory consisting of SHOULDs. So I > think we might be able to finish up (or skip over) the transport layer > soon, and move on to the REST layer (state, CN). If you want to see > how I think CN should be understood see > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0080.html . > > As usual organizing AWWSW is painful because so little effort is going > into it between calls, and that's none of our faults. But we agreed > we'd keeping meeting, so let's. > > Jonathan > >
Received on Sunday, 15 February 2009 04:10:35 UTC