- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:29:36 +0100
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Jonathan, > If Michael is present: report on what Michael has done Yes, Michael will be present ;) Additionally I've got a new proposal [1], based on our early discussion re IR/NIR: As we seem to agree the term non-information resource is (at best) misleading and only relevant for certain applications (such as found in the Web of Data realm). Still, we might want to be able to differentiate between 'things available on the Web' and 'things, be it abstract things like concepts or real-world objects, which are *not* available directly on the Web, but only descriptions of them exist (that are accessible via the Web)'. Well, here is my proposal: as depicted in [1], let us define 'resource', and a sub-set of it, called 'dereferencable resource' where the former covers everything one could imagine and the latter is the base for all generic, FTRR, REST, etc. resources. This would enable us to talk about resources in general (that is in applications that don't have to or don't want to care about the difference) and point out the difference in cases where this is important (aka Web of Data). Forgive me in case I'm rehashing old/already existing proposals - this is likely not due to my ignorance. Happy to learn if others had thoughts in the same direction. Cheers, Michael [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswVocabularyDependencies#proposals -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html http://webofdata.wordpress.com/ > From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org> > Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:53:40 -0400 > To: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org> > Subject: Next AWWSW telecon Tue 4/14 > Resent-From: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 13:54:30 +0000 > > Agenda: > > If Michael is present: report on what Michael has done > If TimBL is present: explore nature of 'generic resources' a bit more > If TimBL and Alan are both present: attempt to draft an agreement-to- > disagree re definitions of terms such as 'generic resource' > Otherwise: explore JAR's diagram > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/awwsw/jar-diagram-4.pdf > some more > > ... or, suggestions welcome. > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 10:30:17 UTC