RE: httpRange-14 erratum

Re TAG finding:

 - there was[1];
 - it wasn't going well;
 - the CoolUri's paper [2] was covering similar ground (and IMO was more coherent);

... so we abandoned it if favour of helping get the CoolUri's paper done.

Backtrack through earlier versions of [1] and you'll probably understand why we set it asside :-)

Stuart

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/httpRange-14/HttpRange-14.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris
--
Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-awwsw-request@w3.org
> [mailto:public-awwsw-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rees
> Sent: 23 November 2008 04:07
> To: Alan Ruttenberg
> Cc: public-awwsw@w3.org
> Subject: httpRange-14 erratum
>
>
> I finally got around to adding my erratum about "is an
> information resource" to
>
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/ErrataHttpRange14
>
> I also added a comment that there's a TAG finding in progress that's
> relevant. I forget what it's called; perhaps Noah or Stuart can
> refresh my memory.
>
> Jonathan
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2008 12:36:03 UTC