- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:53:37 +0000
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org>
Regarding rules at http://esw.w3.org/topic/AwwswDboothsRules > From: Jonathan Rees [mailto:jar@creativecommons.org] > [ . . . ] > Fortunately you never use awww:Resource, so it would be safe > to just remove it from rules.n3. Good point. I've deleted it. I was implicitly using rdfs:Resource anyway. > > I see that your rules imply that 200-responders aren't > physical things, which is good. The only consequence of > something being an awww:InformationResource is that it is > abstract, however. It might be nice to be able to deduce that > 200-responders are not other kinds of abstract things such as > numbers or representations (as Tim has repeatedly asserted). Hmm, I guess we'll need some classes of those other things in order to do that. What would you suggest? David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2008 06:54:54 UTC