- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:55:26 +0000
- To: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
- CC: "public-awwsw@w3.org" <public-awwsw@w3.org>
> From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) > [ . . . ] > > From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) > > [ . . . ] > > If so, then the URI is being declared differently at > > different times, i.e., the same URI is used to denote > > different things at different times, which is one form of URI > > collision. (I.e., the same party is using the URI to denote > > different things at different times, rather than different > > parties using the URI to denote different things.) If that > > isn't what you are talking about then please explain. > > I don't quite know how to square that with an earlier response > which seemed to take a relaxed stance about can be > 'in' a URI declaration. It isn't exactly a relaxed stance, but a recognition that the architecture cannot prevent people from making poor quality URI declarations -- URI declarations that do not adequately distinguish the resource from other resources -- or conflicting URI declarations, either at one time or over time. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 09:56:48 UTC