- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:56:43 -0400
- To: public-awwsw@w3.org
As promised I've prepared a little ontology that is my attempt to continue where Stuart left off - to establish a framework that lets you make statements about the nonarbitrariness of resources, such as the idea that if at time t there are extant two representations R1 in French and R2 in Spanish, and R1 is a favorable review of movie M, then R2 should not be a bad review of movie M. In order to do this I had to come up with a theory of information resources. I've tried to be as faithful as possible to Fielding and Taylor's ICSE paper, which is hard because it's not internally consistent, with AWWW, which is hard because I don't understand the definitions it gives, and with various statements I've heard from Tim. The ontology (written in OWL and rendered in RDF/XML) is here: http://purl.org/NET/inforesource To read it you could use triplr or cwm to convert it to turtle, but a better bet is to view it in some ontology viewer such as Protege; I used Protege 4. Yes, ideally there would be a nice readable turtle version, but the technology I'm using isn't quite there yet. There's a not very pretty omnigraffle diagram of the approach at http://sw.neurocommons.org/2008/inforesource.png which I will not take the time to prettify now (I don't know why the background is gray)
Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 03:57:21 UTC