- From: Gunnar Andersson <gandersson@genivi.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 19:22:31 +0200
- To: ted@w3.org, public-autowebplatform <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 12:44 -0400, Ted Guild wrote: > Today's minutes are available online > > https://www.w3.org/2017/09/12-auto-minutes > Thanks for providing the minutes, Ted. I think I was misquoted here though: (I know it was hard to hear) > Gunnar: if a specification has features beyond what is needed, that might be an indication it is not the best match I was rather making the opposite point - that you can probably simply use a subset of the features, and the existence of additional features should *not* offhand be used as an indication of it not being a good match. I did note that it of course needs to be investigated if the existence of additional features has a negative impact (performance, overhead or complexity, ...), but I don't think that is always the case. In the case of WAMP [1], there is no doubt in my mind that also having some powerful features (such as routed RPC) available when you need them is beneficial in a full system design that takes into account not only the Web side of things, but other parts too. This is also perhaps a bit misleading: > Gunnar: we have been making some big changes on LBS on our side To be clear, no major changes to the LBS APIs. I only gave a heads-up that in this area you can expect additional supporting technology for those APIs to come soon. Hope this helps, - Gunnar [1] http://wamp-proto.org/ -- Gunnar Andersson <gandersson@genivi.org> Development Lead GENIVI Alliance
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2017 17:23:10 UTC