- From: Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:25:28 -0800
- To: ¹ÚÁ¾¼±(Justin Park) <jongseon.park@lge.com>
- Cc: "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Merge as soon as you can. You might have to rebase. On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Rees, Kevron <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> wrote: > Excellent. I like it. > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:32 AM, ¹ÚÁ¾¼±(Justin Park) <jongseon.park@lge.com> wrote: >> Hi Kevron, >> >> I considered something like below. >> https://rawgithub.com/jsbach86/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html >> >> It looks quite long even though we didn't merge all yet. >> However, do we need to make it on the same document since all interfaces should share 'basic interfaces'? >> >> Regards, >> Justin >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rees, Kevron [mailto:kevron.m.rees@intel.com] >> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:59 AM >> To: ¹ÚÁ¾¼±(Justin Park) >> Cc: public-autowebplatform@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Running status and Climate type merge >> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:50 AM, ¹ÚÁ¾¼±(Justin Park) <jongseon.park@lge.com> wrote: >>> Hi Kevron, >>> >>> Two links below have some differences. >>> https://rawgithub.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html >>> It seems to applied my patch. >>> >>> https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/8 >>> But, it's the previous one you suggested before. >>> >>> I updated the original one to apply Paul's and your opinions, but >>> didn't reflect changing SideWindow to Window by including defrost. >>> It's hard to say which one is correct or wrong, but it looks natural >>> to bind defrost equipment together including side mirrors, and to bind >>> side windows for openness. >>> It's close to group interfaces based on functions rather than objects. >>> My automotive experience may make me biased toward this. >>> >> >> I'm okay with different functional interfaces if the group is. My new merge request has your more pristine version. Although, I may have messed up ClimateControl. Please look to make sure it is correct. >> >>> In addition, how about grouping the interfaces into several groups as >>> we divided the works. >> >> Do you mean keep them as separate documents? Or just sections within the main spec itself? >> >>> If we merged all the interfaces, the document will be quite long and >>> many interfaces will be located on the same level. >>> Although the grouping itself don't have any meaning, it could make it >>> easy to see the document and look more organized. >>> >> >> Do you mean something like this: >> >> https://github.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/blob/master/vehicle_spec.html#L190 >> >> BR, >> Kevron >> >>> Regards, >>> Justin >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Rees, Kevron [mailto:kevron.m.rees@intel.com] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:05 AM >>>> To: public-autowebplatform@w3.org >>>> Subject: Re: Running status and Climate type merge >>>> >>>> This is what the draft will look like after the merge: >>>> https://rawgithub.com/tripzero/automotive-bg/master/vehicle_spec.html >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Rees, Kevron >>>> <kevron.m.rees@intel.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > https://github.com/w3c/automotive-bg/pull/8 >>>> > >>>> > I'll leave it open for comments for a few days and then merge it in. >>>> > >>>> > -Kevron >>> >>
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 21:25:56 UTC