- From: Yasuyuki Moriguchi <ya-moriguchi@kddi.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:42:38 +0900
- To: <jongseon.park@lge.com>, "'Andy Gryc'" <AGryc@qnx.com>
- Cc: "'Abramski, Adam M'" <adam.m.abramski@intel.com>, <public-autowebplatform@w3.org>
Dear Adam, Andy Proposal time, 10th July 15:00(Japan time) is OK for me. Several japanese participants(ie. KDDI, JARI, Intel Japan, ???) will be assembled in a KDDI's conference room. Rotation will be good idea for equal world-wide participation. Is there a concrete plan of rotation? Regards, Yasuyuki Moriguchi KDDI Corporation > -----Original Message----- > From: 박종선(Justin Park) [mailto:jongseon.park@lge.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 8:20 PM > To: 'Andy Gryc' > Cc: 'Abramski, Adam M'; public-autowebplatform@w3.org > Subject: RE: Proposal of Monthly Conference Calls > > Dear Andy, > > > > I agree with you. Propose time zone looks severe to eastern America area. > Rotation will be fair. > > Having said that, I’m afraid I can’t attend the call in the learly every > three months. :( > > > > Regards, > > Justin > > > > From: Andy Gryc [mailto:AGryc@qnx.com] > Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 10:56 PM > To: jongseon.park@lge.com; 'Abramski, Adam M'; > public-autowebplatform@w3.org > Subject: Re: Proposal of Monthly Conference Calls > > > > Thank you very much Adam; I think this is great for the first meeting. > > > > However, I think it would be better to continually rotate the time for the > following meetings so that we aren't always inconveniencing the same > timezone. For example, if all the North American meetings are at 2AM, we > may have a difficult time getting North American representation. Same thing > applies for all the other time zones, of course. > > > > If we rotate the times, I think it would be better to help get more equal > world-wide participation. What does everyone else think? > > > > --Andy > > > > From: "박종선 (Justin Park)" <jongseon.park@lge.com> > Organization: LG Electronics > Reply-To: "jongseon.park@lge.com" <jongseon.park@lge.com> > Date: Sunday, 23 June, 2013 8:13 PM > To: "'Abramski, Adam M'" <adam.m.abramski@intel.com>, > "public-autowebplatform@w3.org" <public-autowebplatform@w3.org> > Subject: RE: Proposal of Monthly Conference Calls > Resent-From: <public-autowebplatform@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Sunday, 23 June, 2013 8:19 PM > > > > Dear All, > > > > It’s OK for me. And I just want to correct the time for Tokyo and HongKong. > > > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2013&mo > nth=7&day=11&hour=6&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=43&p3=195&p4=248&p5=102 > > > > Location > > Local time > > Time zone > > UTC offset > > San Francisco (U.S.A. - California) > > Tuesday, 9 July 2013, 23:00:00 > > PDT > > UTC-7 hours > > Boston (U.S.A. - Massachusetts) > > Wednesday, 10 July 2013, 02:00:00 > > EDT > > UTC-4 hours > > Paris (France) > > Wednesday, 10 July 2013, 08:00:00 > > CEST > > UTC+2 hours > > Tokyo (Japan) > > Wednesday, 10 July 2013, 15:00:00 > > JST > > UTC+9 hours > > Hong Kong (Hong Kong) > > Wednesday, 10 July 2013, 14:00:00 > > HKT > > UTC+8 hours > > Corresponding UTC (GMT) > > Wednesday, 10 July 2013, 06:00:00 > > > > > > > > Regards, > > Justin > > > > From: Abramski, Adam M [mailto:adam.m.abramski@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 8:34 AM > To: public-autowebplatform@w3.org > Cc: Abramski, Adam M > Subject: Proposal of Monthly Conference Calls > > > > Hi all, > > > > I wanted to propose starting a monthly conf call. This was discussed > during each of the F2F meetings. > > > > I think we need a way for the entire group to have a consistent cadence > to get together to discuss action items, progress toward goals, technical > discussions that need hashing out or a decision, etc. as we drive toward > a draft vehicle API spec report. > > > > I would like to propose the second Tues night/Wed of every month starting > July 9th/10that: > > > > 11pm – Pacific (LA, SF) > > 2am – Eastern (Boston, NY) > > 8am – Central European (Paris, Berlin, etc.) > > 4pm – Japan (Tokyo, Hong Kong) > > > > This way everyone who is a member of our business group can participate > and join the conversation. > > > > Does this seem feasible to everyone? > > > > Please discuss over the list with the goal of a decision by COB next Wed > June 26th. > > > > Sincerely, > Adam
Received on Friday, 28 June 2013 07:46:39 UTC